Pander
2015-03-22 20:14:13 UTC
Hi all,
When running stat -freq, one gest a series of power spectra. The
documentation states:
"The -freq option calculates the input's power spectrum (4096 point
DFT) instead of the statistics listed above. This should only be used
with a single channel audio file."
The implication is that it is not guaranteed that the last power
spectrum consists of a result based on 4096 points. To illustrate this,
make a 30 second recording of a 125 Hz signal with an 48kHz sample rate.
The three resulting spectra look like this:
- first Loading Image...
- second Loading Image...
- third and last Loading Image...
It is clear that the last one is proper on the outline but has many
intermediate points which are not desirable.
This is of course understandable (and correct?). However, should this be
noted in the documentation as a warning to prevent wrong assumptions?
I can reproduce this almost always. With a WAV file of 487 MB the first
and one but last power spectra look like Loading Image...
and Loading Image...
respectively but the last one is
also malformed, see Loading Image...
When using averages over multiple power spectra, is it wise to ignore
the last one? Is there a way to calculate when the DFT fits exactly and
the last one doesn't have to be ignored? Can automatic notification this
be part of sox?
Regards,
Pander
When running stat -freq, one gest a series of power spectra. The
documentation states:
"The -freq option calculates the input's power spectrum (4096 point
DFT) instead of the statistics listed above. This should only be used
with a single channel audio file."
The implication is that it is not guaranteed that the last power
spectrum consists of a result based on 4096 points. To illustrate this,
make a 30 second recording of a 125 Hz signal with an 48kHz sample rate.
The three resulting spectra look like this:
- first Loading Image...
- second Loading Image...
- third and last Loading Image...
It is clear that the last one is proper on the outline but has many
intermediate points which are not desirable.
This is of course understandable (and correct?). However, should this be
noted in the documentation as a warning to prevent wrong assumptions?
I can reproduce this almost always. With a WAV file of 487 MB the first
and one but last power spectra look like Loading Image...
and Loading Image...
respectively but the last one isalso malformed, see Loading Image...
When using averages over multiple power spectra, is it wise to ignore
the last one? Is there a way to calculate when the DFT fits exactly and
the last one doesn't have to be ignored? Can automatic notification this
be part of sox?
Regards,
Pander